The current rules Habrahabr pushing to kokovtsev, the situation should be improved
Me the idea that wishes (sandbox for zaminusovali) seem productive, and even worthy of further development, and here's why.
This morning I wrote a good Abramovic (now he's got a rating of "+60"), but controversial (including why I have the last few days have been negative karma, even "-7" — which, however, at the same time explains my doubrovski, snehavasthi reputation among gabrovtsi).
A paradoxical situation: becoming the author of the popular hepatophyta, I got the chance to give an invite to anyone in a sandbox (and, moreover, so that the blessings stint will instantly become gabrovsek having exactly zero karma), while I myself could not raise their karma to zero.
this paradox I came out relatively noble way, that is chose good Abramovic in the sandbox and invited the author it on Habr. Now, if the author survives on Habrahabr during the week and accumulate lots of good karma, only then in a week he'll be able to vote for someone else's karma, and then, maybe, show gratitude, increasing in response to karma me. Maybe it doesn't, forget. I myself have to remind him about it will not, such a reminder would be insensitive question in human gratitude. In addition, the transition, say,"-2" "-1" not much help: this week I either could hope to independently collect the remaining karma or I, this humble one would not help seriously.
But inevitably have come to a grim conclusion: by itself, it turns out that a couple of paradoxes provoke all of the number of zaminusovali gabrovtsi on kokovtsev, the creation of new aliases with the transfer to them of the invite and further work from a fresh alias, that is, starting with zero karma, and not a minus. Though I such did not succumb to provocation, but soberly recognize and encourage all of you to realize: that can happen much less noble characters.
What a situation looks bad, that is a lowly act, it would be better henceforth, no one to provoke.
But what do you need in order not to provoke zaminusovali of gabrovtsi on kokovtsev in the above paradoxical situation with the invitation (invite)? Think it's enough to make the invitation available not only for distribution to unauthorized persons, but also to reset their own karma when she sdelalsya negative. Maybe even not just to zero and to bring some positive value to at least the ability to use theHTML tags in the comments, which svejeprigotovlenny gabrovtsi do not possess. Then check the alias from scratch will become completely unprofitable.
A more global question: what need then to do and not to provoke zaminusovali of gabrovtsi any such kokovtsev, which is done by registering a new alias using the sandbox? It seems, it is enough to make a sandbox (or, even better, to do some other blog) is available for the publication of hepatopetal zaminusovali habrovany, and for earning karma there. (Earlier for this purpose was arranged with a blog, "I'm smart", but now see a gaping void on the ground that gabriellacilmi niche rightfully took it. Saturability through the creation hepatophyta became absolutely impossible, the place of hope was firmly occupied by hopelessness.)
And maybe, also would like to avoid such a situation, when people put hepatopexyrated "60", at the same time no seeing or having any idea about what the author hepatophyta rapidly loses karma and even goes negative so that it is necessary to "save" him. Because of course, if abrahamovce powerful plus some Abramovic, then it is reasonable to assume that at least some of the pros would like to continue to see pleasing them abramovici exactly the same author (which is impossible if the author will go into negative karma). Now it turns out not so sensible decision: now readers, when gratefully vote for Abramovic, it is much more likely and rather give (mechanism invites) author zaplanovano hepatophyta only possibility is that the author invite some another anonymous author from the sandbox.
To sort of rectify the situation and give Hebraist in the hands of the universal tool, which allows when reading any decent hepatophyta actively and productively to Express the simple idea "author, write more!", ought to promiseit one of the following workarounds:
1) Arrange some automatic dependence of the karma of the author from hepatopetal of the author.
2) Arrange a direct hand the dependence of the karma of the author from his hepatopetal, that is to let readers any hepatophyta not only to vote for the top hepatophyta, but also (here) and vote for the karma of the author hepatophyta.
3) to Allow readers of all hepatophyta even just to see the amount of karma author karatavica, and then they let him understand.
(This list is incomplete; perhaps you, the readers, will think a couple of other possible solutions. Three came up and I mentioned solutions first and I myself do not really like: is it appropriate to force the machine to make decisions instead ofpeople-readers?)
Article based on information from habrahabr.ru
This morning I wrote a good Abramovic (now he's got a rating of "+60"), but controversial (including why I have the last few days have been negative karma, even "-7" — which, however, at the same time explains my doubrovski, snehavasthi reputation among gabrovtsi).
A paradoxical situation: becoming the author of the popular hepatophyta, I got the chance to give an invite to anyone in a sandbox (and, moreover, so that the blessings stint will instantly become gabrovsek having exactly zero karma), while I myself could not raise their karma to zero.
this paradox I came out relatively noble way, that is chose good Abramovic in the sandbox and invited the author it on Habr. Now, if the author survives on Habrahabr during the week and accumulate lots of good karma, only then in a week he'll be able to vote for someone else's karma, and then, maybe, show gratitude, increasing in response to karma me. Maybe it doesn't, forget. I myself have to remind him about it will not, such a reminder would be insensitive question in human gratitude. In addition, the transition, say,
But inevitably have come to a grim conclusion: by itself, it turns out that a couple of paradoxes provoke all of the number of zaminusovali gabrovtsi on kokovtsev, the creation of new aliases with the transfer to them of the invite and further work from a fresh alias, that is, starting with zero karma, and not a minus. Though I such did not succumb to provocation, but soberly recognize and encourage all of you to realize: that can happen much less noble characters.
What a situation looks bad, that is a lowly act, it would be better henceforth, no one to provoke.
But what do you need in order not to provoke zaminusovali of gabrovtsi on kokovtsev in the above paradoxical situation with the invitation (invite)? Think it's enough to make the invitation available not only for distribution to unauthorized persons, but also to reset their own karma when she sdelalsya negative. Maybe even not just to zero and to bring some positive value to at least the ability to use the
A more global question: what need then to do and not to provoke zaminusovali of gabrovtsi any such kokovtsev, which is done by registering a new alias using the sandbox? It seems, it is enough to make a sandbox (or, even better, to do some other blog) is available for the publication of hepatopetal zaminusovali habrovany, and for earning karma there. (Earlier for this purpose was arranged with a blog, "I'm smart", but now see a gaping void on the ground that gabriellacilmi niche rightfully took it. Saturability through the creation hepatophyta became absolutely impossible, the place of hope was firmly occupied by hopelessness.)
And maybe, also would like to avoid such a situation, when people put hepatopexy
To sort of rectify the situation and give Hebraist in the hands of the universal tool, which allows when reading any decent hepatophyta actively and productively to Express the simple idea "author, write more!", ought to promiseit one of the following workarounds:
1) Arrange some automatic dependence of the karma of the author from hepatopetal of the author.
2) Arrange a direct hand the dependence of the karma of the author from his hepatopetal, that is to let readers any hepatophyta not only to vote for the top hepatophyta, but also (here) and vote for the karma of the author hepatophyta.
3) to Allow readers of all hepatophyta even just to see the amount of karma author karatavica, and then they let him understand.
(This list is incomplete; perhaps you, the readers, will think a couple of other possible solutions. Three came up and I mentioned solutions first and I myself do not really like: is it appropriate to force the machine to make decisions instead of
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий